Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
IV. Lange v. California, 594 U.S. ___ (2021), was a United States Supreme Court case involving the exigent circumstances requirement related to the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The Court ruled unanimously that the warrantless entry into a home by police in pursuit of a misdemeanant is not unequivocally justified.
A California ballot measure that would have required voter approval for any future state tax hikes will not appear on November ballots, the California Supreme Court ruled.
Born. 1968 or 1969 (age 55–56) Political party. Democratic. Education. Stanford University ( BA) University of California, Davis ( JD) Kelli Evans (born 1968 or 1969) [1] is an American lawyer who serves as an associate justice of the Supreme Court of California. She previously served as a judge of the Alameda County Superior Court .
The California Supreme Court on Thursday took the rare step of removing a measure from the November ballot that would have made it harder to raise taxes, siding with Gov. Gavin Newsom by ruling ...
Unit. Counterintelligence Corps. Cruz Reynoso (May 2, 1931 – May 7, 2021) was an American civil rights lawyer and jurist. Reynoso was the first Chicano Associate Justice of the California Supreme Court, serving from 1982 to 1987. He also served on the California Third District Court of Appeal. [2] In 1986, along with two other liberal members ...
The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday ruled that cities in California and the West may enforce laws restricting homeless encampments on sidewalks and other public property. The justices disagreed with ...
Supreme Court of the United States. Argued December 13, 1972 Decided June 18, 1973; Full case name: Goldstein v. California: ... California, 412 U.S. 546 (1973) ...
Samson v. California, 547 U.S. 843 (2006), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court affirmed the California Court of Appeal's ruling that suspicionless searches of parolees are lawful under California law and that the search in this case was reasonable under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution because it was not arbitrary, capricious, or harassing.