Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
One team’s job is to argue that the resolution— the statement that we should make some specific change to a national or international problem —is a good idea. [1] Affirmative teams generally present a plan as a proposal for implementation of the resolution.
Preparation time. In policy debate, preparation time ( prep time) is the amount of time given to each team to prepare for their speeches. Prep time may be taken at any time in any interval. Another form of prep time is known as alternate-use time. Alternate use time replaces preparation time and cross-examination.
The First Affirmative Constructive (1AC) is the first speech given in a round, presented by the affirmative team. Nearly every 1AC includes inherency, advantages, and solvency, as well as a plan text, the textual expression of the affirmative policy option. The 1AC is generally pre-scripted before the round.
The input–process–output ( IPO) model of teams provides a framework for conceptualizing teams. The IPO model suggests that many factors influence a team's productivity and cohesiveness. It "provides a way to understand how teams perform, and how to maximize their performance". [ 1]
Tuckman's stages of group development. The forming–storming–norming–performing model of group development was first proposed by Bruce Tuckman in 1965, [ 1] who said that these phases are all necessary and inevitable in order for a team to grow, face up to challenges, tackle problems, find solutions, plan work, and deliver results.
Policy debate. In debate, which is a form of argument competition, a case, sometimes known as plan, is a textual advocacy presented, in form of speech, by the Pro team as a normative or " should " statement; it is generally presented in the First Pro Constructive ( 1AC ). A case will often include either the resolution or a rephrasing of it.
Debate is a process that involves formal discourse, discussion, and oral addresses on a particular topic or collection of topics, often with a moderator and an audience. In a debate, arguments are put forward for common opposing viewpoints. Debates have historically occurred in public meetings, academic institutions, debate halls, coffeehouses ...
Topicality. Policy debate. v. t. e. Topicality is a resolution issue in policy debate which pertains to whether or not the plan affirms the resolution as worded. [ 1] To contest the topicality of the affirmative, the negative interprets a word or words in the resolution and argues that the affirmative does not meet that definition, that the ...