Gamer.Site Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Stratton Oakmont, Inc. v. Prodigy Services Co. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stratton_Oakmont,_Inc._v...

    Stuart L. Ain. Stratton Oakmont, Inc. v. Prodigy Services Co., 23 Media L. Rep. 1794 ( N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1995), [1] is a 1995 decision of the New York Supreme Court [nb 1] holding that online service providers can be liable for the speech of their users. The ruling caused controversy among early supporters of the Internet, including some lawmakers ...

  3. New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. Bruen

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_State_Rifle...

    U.S. Const. amends. II, XIV. New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. Bruen, 597 U.S. 1 (2022), abbreviated NYSRPA v. Bruen and also known as NYSRPA II or Bruen to distinguish it from the 2020 case, is a landmark decision [1] [2] [3] of the United States Supreme Court related to the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution.

  4. New York Supreme Court - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_Supreme_Court

    The Supreme Court of the State of New York is the trial-level court of general jurisdiction in the judiciary of New York. It is vested with unlimited civil and criminal jurisdiction, although in many counties outside New York City it acts primarily as a court of civil jurisdiction, with most criminal matters handled in County Court. [1]

  5. Watchtower Bible & Tract Society of New York, Inc. v. Village ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Watchtower_Bible_&_Tract...

    Laws applied. U.S. Const. amend. Watchtower Bible & Tract Society of New York, Inc. v. Village of Stratton, 536 U.S. 150 (2002), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a town ordinance's provisions making it a misdemeanor to engage in door-to-door advocacy without first registering with town officials and receiving a ...

  6. Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Central_Hudson_Gas...

    I, XIV. Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service Commission, 447 U.S. 557 (1980), was an important case decided by the United States Supreme Court that laid out a four-part test for determining when restrictions on commercial speech violated the First Amendment of the United States Constitution. Justice Powell wrote the opinion of ...

  7. U.S. Const. amend. Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York City, 438 U.S. 104 (1978), was a landmark United States Supreme Court decision on compensation for regulatory takings. [1] Penn Central sued New York City after the New York City Landmark Preservation Commission denied its bid to build a large office building on top of Grand Central ...

  8. NY's top court to hear case over state requiring health ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/nys-top-court-hear-case-070120188.html

    Nothing in the 2021 Supreme Court ruling requires New York's judges to drop that precedent, the state contends. Anti-Abortion rights activist rally in front of the US Supreme Court on March 26 ...

  9. Lochner v. New York - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lochner_v._New_York

    Lochner v. New York, 198 U.S. 45 (1905), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court holding that a New York State statute that prescribed maximum working hours for bakers violated the bakers' right to freedom of contract under the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. [1] The decision has been effectively overturned. [2] [3] [4]