Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Discussions on regulation of artificial intelligence in the United States have included topics such as the timeliness of regulating AI, the nature of the federal regulatory framework to govern and promote AI, including what agency should lead, the regulatory and governing powers of that agency, and how to update regulations in the face of rapidly changing technology, as well as the roles of ...
Policy goals outlined in the executive order pertain to promoting competition in the AI industry, preventing AI-enabled threats to civil liberties and national security, and ensuring U.S. global competitiveness in the AI field. The executive order requires a number of major federal agencies to create dedicated "chief artificial intelligence ...
The lawmakers called for the U.S. government to start spending at least $32 billion annually on AI “as soon as possible”—and that’s not including what it intends to spend on AI for defense ...
v. t. e. Regulation of algorithms, or algorithmic regulation, is the creation of laws, rules and public sector policies for promotion and regulation of algorithms, particularly in artificial intelligence and machine learning. [1] [2] [3] For the subset of AI algorithms, the term regulation of artificial intelligence is used.
That same order requires AI companies to notify the government when they develop a system that could pose a “serious risk to national security, national economic security, or national public ...
The first-of-its-kind bill aims to reduce risks created by AI. It is fiercely opposed by venture capital firms and tech compa California advances unique safety regulations for AI companies despite ...
Regulation of AI can be seen as positive social means to manage the AI control problem (the need to ensure long-term beneficial AI), with other social responses such as doing nothing or banning being seen as impractical, and approaches such as enhancing human capabilities through transhumanism techniques like brain-computer interfaces being seen as potentially complementary.
The move reflects the US government’s close collaboration with the private sector as it scrambles to address both the risks and benefits of AI in the absence of a targeted national AI law.