Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The Texas Senate Committee on Border Security has raised questions about the ongoing costs of Abbott's Operation Lone Star on the border. Texas has spent $11 billion since 2021 on Operation Lone Star.
Abbott started busing in 2022 as part of Operation Lone Star, an $11 billion program designed to address the migrant surge in Texas. Large numbers of migrant buses rumbled out of the border towns ...
Operation Lone Star ( OLS) is a joint operation between the Texas Department of Public Safety and the Texas Military Department along the United States–Mexico border in southern Texas. The operation started in 2021 and is ongoing. According to Texas Governor Greg Abbott, the operation is intended to counter a rise in illegal immigration, the ...
Birdwell, a Republican from Granbury who chairs the Texas Senate Committee on Border Security, received no direct answer to his question during a committee hearing Wednesday. But Mike Banks, Gov ...
Ken Paxton. On January 11, 2024, the Texas National Guard took control of Shelby Park, a 47-acre (19 ha) area of parkland in the town of Eagle Pass, along the Rio Grande river, which separates the United States from Mexico, after Texas Governor Greg Abbott signed an emergency declaration to close the park. In his declaration, Abbott cited the ...
Passed the Senate on June 27, 2013 (68–32 [1]) The Border Security, Economic Opportunity, and Immigration Modernization Act of 2013 (Bill S.744) [2] was a proposed immigration reform bill introduced by Sen. Charles Schumer ( D - NY) in the United States Senate. [3] The bill was co-sponsored by the other seven members of the "Gang of Eight", a ...
Texas can keep a 1,000-foot (300-meter) long floating barrier in the Rio Grande to deter illegal border crossings by migrants at the river separating the United States and Mexico, a U.S. appeals ...
Johnson v. Transportation Agency is the only United States Supreme Court case to address a sex-based affirmative action plan in the employment context. The Court found that the plan did not violate the protection against discrimination on the basis of sex in the Civil Rights Act of 1964's Title VII. [270] [non-primary source needed] 1988