Gamer.Site Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Please contact the clerk's office at 415-355-8000 for Published Opinions posted before January 3, 2005. Ninth Circuit opinions (along with those of several other circuits) dating back to January 2008 are available for free with advanced search capabilities at the Government Printing Office's Federal Digital System here. More records available.

  3. For questions about opening a new case in the court of appeals or general questions about the court, please email Questions@ca9.uscourts.gov. When filing an emergency motion, email Emergency@ca9.uscourts.gov. For questions about a pending motion, email Motions@ca9.uscourts.gov. Court staff will respond during business hours, from 8:30am to 5:00pm.

  4. Memoranda. Log of Unpublished Dispositions. The court is utilizing an automated process for posting opinions and memorandum dispositions to the website, which uploads them immediately as they are filed in each case rather than manually all at once at a designated time. Memorandum dispositions may be filed up until approximately 4:00pm Pacific Time.

  5. US 9th Circuit Opinions and Cases | FindLaw

    caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-9th-circuit

    United States Ninth Circuit cases. FindLaw's database of United States Ninth Circuit features decisions since January 1970. You can browse decisions by date and search by docket number, case title, and full text. Party name. Keyword. Docket number. Party name. View results.

  6. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

    cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2024/05/31/23-2270.pdf

    FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT . WALTER BETSCHART, on their behalf, and on behalf of all others similarly situated; JOSHUA SHANE ... Mendoza, Jr., Circuit Judges. Opinion by Judge Owens; Dissent by Judge Bumatay . 4 BETSCHART V. STATE OF OREGON SUMMARY * Habeas Corpus . In a case in which a class of incarcerated indigent

  7. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

    cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2022/09/28/20-35752.pdf

    OPINION. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Mark D. Clarke, Magistrate Judge, Presiding. Argued and Submitted December 6, 2021 San Francisco, California. Filed September 28, 2022. Before: Ronald M. Gould and Daniel P. Collins, Circuit Judges, and Roslyn O. Silver,* District Judge.

  8. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

    cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2021/09/27/20-15378.pdf

    OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Miranda M. Du, Chief District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted March 10, 2021 Las Vegas, Nevada Filed September 27, 2021 Before: Richard R. Clifton, Jacqueline H. Nguyen, and Mark J. Bennett, Circuit Judges. Opinion by Judge Clifton; Dissent by Judge Bennett

  9. Justia U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals Opinion Summaries

    us9thcircuitcourtofappealsopinions.justia.com

    Daily Opinion Summaries for the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals by Justia. ... (ADA) and various state law claims.The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reviewed the case. The court held that the district court erred in excluding the entirety of the plaintiffs' expert reports, as the reports were based on sufficient facts ...

  10. 2021 Ninth Circuit US Court of Appeals Case Law - Justia Law

    law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca9/2021

    Date: December 28, 2021. Docket Number: 20-56316. Justia Opinion Summary: The Ninth Circuit reversed the district court's denial, as untimely, Volkswagen's motion to intervene in a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) suit regarding millions of VW's documents. This case stems from the so-called….

  11. Ninth Circuit US Court of Appeals Case Law - Justia Law

    law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca9

    Date: September 9, 2024. Docket Number: 22-55946. Justia Opinion Summary: The case involves a class action lawsuit against the City of Los Angeles, challenging the constitutionality of a $63 late fee imposed for failing to pay a parking meter fine within 21 days. The plaintiffs argue that this….