Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
GML is easy to learn, and it's fairly quick to prototype and try new things in GameMaker. On the other hand, Unity is more organized in my experience, and you might be able to get help easier, due to the large (r) community. Plus, Unity has more tools readily available, such as lighting and rigidbodies. IMO, I like GameMaker better, even though ...
Adventure Creator is a fully-featured Unity toolkit that has all you need to make your own adventure game. From 2D point-and-clickers like Monkey Island, to cinematic epics like Telltale's The Walking Dead, AC can make it happen. Designed for developers of all backgrounds, its visual-scripting interface and intuitive design keeps it artist ...
Also, pixel art comes off better in Game Maker, while Unity works better with scalable art. Hotline Miami series were made in Game Maker, for example. And Undertale. So think about games like this in context of Game Maker. If your ambition is about there, it's much saner to go for Game Maker. 6.
11- I've heard that handling larger projects is easier in Unity but since we are a very small team, haven't faced this. What I like about Game Maker: 1- It's meant for 2D. 2- It's simple that you get faster to make your game rather than systems and editors and stuff.
Unity has a much bigger community with many more resources than GameMaker does, to be honest. Unity has a lot more freedom, too. It’s intimidating, but in the long run, Unity will be much better for learning to apply code (C#) than Gamemaker. 7. Reply.
The game will have complex mechanics which is easier to do in c#, plus Unity lets you pause the engine and look at things in realtime ( really helps with debugging complex stuff ). The downside is Unity just isn't a 2d tilebased engine natively. I wrestled a lot with the resolution + different screen ratios.
Also - Unity is not solely a 3D-engine anymore. If you're worried you can't create something in RPG Maker, learn Unity and make your 2D RPG in there. You can use tilesets in Unity, that's not really a problem. But you better lower your expectations as even a relatively small 2D RPG like Undertale takes years to develop by yourself.
GameMaker is good for learning general basic concepts, but it's a bit of a mixed bag when things get more complex. Logic in GameMaker is tied to the games frame rate which is a big "no no" in game dev. This functionality can be helpful sometimes but is a very bad standard practice that you don't want to get used to.
It is really hard to maintain a project of a decent size in GM2, GML is vastly inferior to C#, Unity has much better tools (GUI/Player window/debugging etc). GM2 is easier to start with, it deals in pixels instead of units, you'll have an easier time setting up a pixel art project, GML allows more liberties.
It suffers none of Gamemaker's problems and it's very similar in concept and power to Unity (I've read industry people not happy with Unity's royalties have started to switch, also because of the following). Plus, it's fully open source, free to use and royalty free. I started with GM (used 8 and 1.4) and enjoyed it at first, but since trying ...