Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) issued a patent [3] for this technique to Amazon.com in September 1999. Amazon.com also owns the "1-Click" trademark. [4] On May 12, 2006, the USPTO ordered a reexamination [5] of the "One-Click" patent, based on a request filed by Peter Calveley. [6]
patent law. e-commerce. Amazon. com, Inc. v. Barnesandnoble. com, Inc., 337 F.3d 1024 (Fed. Cir., 2001), was a court ruling at the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. [1] The ruling was an important early cyberlaw precedent on the matter of the technologies that enable e-commerce and whether such technologies are eligible ...
Amazon.com Inc v Canada (Commissioner of Patents) is a decision of the Federal Court of Appeal concerning the patentability of business methods within the context of the Patent Act. [1] At issue was the patentability of a method that allowed customers shopping online to make purchases with one-click buying.
U.S. patent 748,626 – Patent for the first version of The Landlord's Game, Issued on Jan 5, 1904; U.S. patent 1,509,312 – Patent for the second version of The Landlord's Game, Issued on Sep 23, 1924; U.S. patent 2,026,082 – Patent awarded to C.B. Darrow for Monopoly on December 31, 1935; The History of The Landlord's Game and Monopoly.
The ongoing battle of the e-readers between Amazon (AMZN) and Barnes & Noble (BKS) was already plenty heated after their under-$200 pricing moves earlier this month. But now the competition takes ...
Neither software nor computer programs are explicitly mentioned in statutory United States patent law.Patent law has changed to address new technologies, and decisions of the United States Supreme Court and United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) beginning in the latter part of the 20th century have sought to clarify the boundary between patent-eligible and patent ...
(Reuters) -Amazon.com's Amazon Web Services, the world's largest cloud-service provider, owes tech company Kove $525 million for violating its patent rights in data-storage technology, an Illinois ...
The original patent term under the 1790 Patent Act was decided individually for each patent, but "not exceeding fourteen years". The 1836 Patent Act (5 Stat. 117, 119, 5) provided (in addition to the fourteen-year term) an extension "for the term of seven years from and after the expiration of the first term" in certain circumstances, when the inventor hasn't got "a reasonable remuneration for ...